RETRO HOT PICKS! On Sale This Week — in 1966!

Scott and Dan hit up the comics racks from 55 years ago!

We haven’t done the ’60s for awhile, so this week for RETRO HOT PICKS, Scott Tipton and I are selecting comics that came out the week of Sept. 1, 1966.

Last time for RETRO HOT PICKS, it was the week of Aug. 25, 1988. Click here to check it out.

(Keep in mind that comics came out on multiple days, so these are technically the comics that went on sale between Aug. 29 and Sept. 4.)

So let’s set the scene: Lyndon Johnson was in his only full term as president. The top movie at the box office was How to Steal a Million, starring Audrey Hepburn, Peter O’Toole and the fantastic Eli Wallach. But get this: The Sound of Music was still so popular that in mid-September, it returned to the top slot in its 80th week of release.

TV ratings for this week either don’t exist or are scarce, but the biggest show on TV was Bonanza. Also popular were The Red Skelton Show and The Andy Griffith Show. Of course, right around the corner were the premieres of Star Trek (Sept. 8), The Green Hornet (Sept. 9), The Monkees (Sept. 12) and Mission: Impossible (Sept. 17). Damn, what a time.

Donovan’s Sunshine Superman, one of the 1960s’ most enduring psychedelic pop tunes, was the best-selling single. The Top 10 was pretty dang great as a whole, particularly the Supremes’ You Can’t Hurry Love (No. 4), the Beatles’ Yellow Submarine (No. 5) and Bobby Hebb’s Sunny (No. 6). What Now My Love, by the awesome Herb Alpert & the Tijuana Brass, topped the albums chart.

Groovy.

Scott Tipton, contributor-at-large, 13th Dimension

Detective Comics #356, DC. If I remember correctly, that super-scaly dude in the Speedo is Alfred. No, really. Sorry, spoiler warning.

Dan adds: The climactic chapter of the Outsider saga, which really deserves its own trade collection. For those not in the know, Alfred was killed off back in 1964 around the same time a mysterious villain named the Outsider debuted. But evidently the TV poobahs wanted Alfred on the 1966 show, so DC finagled a way to bring him back — and revealed that he was really the Outsider. To this day, the milk-white dude with the boils all over his body remains one of my fave Bat-villains. As a kid in the ’70s, I read the reprints in Batman, Detective and Batman Family. Couldn’t get enough.

Batman #186, DC Comics. If that wasn’t strange enough, over in the pages of the other DC Batman series, readers were being introduced to the Joker’s new sidekick, a dwarf clown named Gaggy. You heard me. Gaggy was so popular he returned only 43 years later.

Dan adds: To be completely transparent, one of the reasons I picked this week was because two of my all-time favorite Bat-comics came out. Detective #356 and this Silver Age classic starring the aforementioned Gaggy, a character frequently cited as a low point in the Caped Crusader’s publication history. If by “low point” you mean “high point,” I’m right there with you. Batman #186 also has a very special place in my heart: It was one of the first back issues I bought at a comics convention, when I was about 12. Oh, and love the Murphy Anderson cover!

The Flash #165, DC Comics. It’s Barry Allen’s wedding day! And it wouldn’t be a Flash wedding without the Reverse-Flash showing up to kill the bride. Maybe just invite him next time, Barry.

Dan Greenfield, editor, 13th Dimension

Thor #134, Marvel. Lee and Kirby in the thick of their storied run on the God of Thunder, with the introduction of the High Evolutionary. Plus, Tales of Asgard, as per usual!

Adventure Comics #349, DC. Remember when all it took to create a new villain was to pick a noun and put an “o” on the end? Well, here we get the debut of Universo! (My fave was Eclipso, by the way.) And, apropos of nothing, in the ’70s I created a villain called Inviso for my Mego rogues gallery. He was invisible, of course, so I didn’t have to buy anything.

Captain Atom #83, Charlton. Hey, it’s the first appearance of Ted Kord Blue Beetle! And even if it weren’t, how could you possibly turn down Ditko from cover to cover? I couldn’t!

Tales to Astonish #86, Marvel. Oh, the days when Marvel had to split their books. In this issue you get Namor, the Hulk, Stan Lee and the art of John Buscema, Mike Esposito, Jerry Grandenetti and Bill Everett behind a Gene Colan/Everett cover. Not bad for 12 cents.

Dracula #3, Dell. I love when Dell tried to turn Dracula and Frankenstein into superheroes to try to cash in on the Batmania craze.

Hollywood Romances #46, Charlton. Always with the finger on the pulse, Charlton was all over that “in” group the Rolling Stones — two years after they took part in the British Invasion (and a year after Satisfaction came out.) Still, I wonder whatever happened to those guys?

Thirteen #21, Dell. “Going on Eighteen” remains maybe the creepiest tagline in comics history.

MORE

— RETRO HOT PICKS! On Sale The Week of Aug. 25 — in 1988! Click here.

— RETRO HOT PICKS! On Sale The Week of Aug. 18 — in 1983! Click here.

Primary sources: Mike’s Amazing World of Comics, the Grand Comics Database.

Author: Dan Greenfield

Share This Post On

7 Comments

  1. Another glorious trip down memory lane! However, not to make too big a deal about it, the term “midget” (re: Gaggy, the Joker’s sidekick) really is a horribly obscene one that has no place in our society. The correct term is dwarf or even little person. Just felt a bit of education on this particular point wouldn’t hurt. We can all live & learn. Keep up the good work!

    Post a Reply
    • At the time of its publication, it wasn’t an “offensive” term… it was the official medical term. Along with “moron, idiot, retarded, etc.”. The caption writer may have just been echoing what was in the publication. Also, I am not sure of the nationality of the writer, which also makes a difference in some cases. In some countries, that may still be a perfectly acceptable term. I’m not sure calling the writer out for using a “horribly obscene” term is “not making too big a deal about it.”

      Post a Reply
    • Being a child of the ’70s, when the term “midget” was in common usage, I had no idea it was nowadays considered to be offensive. (Although to be quite honest, I think Gaggy as he’s portrayed on the original comic’s cover, hanging on to the neck of Batman, is more offensive than the term in question.)

      Anyway, I’ve asked the editor to change the phrase when he has a free moment. If there’e even a chance that something I’ve written could make someone feel bad, I don’t want any part of that.

      Thanks for reading.

      Post a Reply
  2. I remember grocery shopping with my mom shortly before going back to school (3rd grade) and seeing Batman #186 at the checkout and begged her to buy it for me. She complied (she was sick of Batman by this point) and I devoured the issue once home. Still have it.

    Post a Reply
  3. Loved The Outsider storyline. But, how did DC see what Marvel was doing and not worry?!

    Post a Reply
  4. Hmm. I’m always happy to use whatever term, expression, preferred pronoun, or whatEVER to not offend, but someone is ALways gonna be offended someway somehow and I can’t really overly concern myself with that every time I speak. Getting that out of the way, Gaggy didn’t impress me much in 1966, but then…Punchline and Harley Quinn don’t do a thing for me, either.

    Post a Reply

Leave a Reply to lutoniputi Cancel reply

%d bloggers like this: