DAN SLOTT Pitched SPIDER-MAN ’67 Meets FILMATION SUPERMAN for Upcoming Crossover

He also pitched NICHOLAS HAMMOND Meets CHRISTOPHER REEVE…

Spider-Man/Superman #1 is coming April 15, the last of the current wave of Super/Spider crossovers, including new one-shots and Facsimile Editions.

You can find the whole rundown over here but the story in the issue that intrigues me the most is Golden Age Superman’s team-up with Spider-Man Noir, by Dan Slott and artist Marcos Martin, who also got a variant cover out of the deal.

Martin

Very cool. Thing is, Slott had other ideas he pitched — and got rejected. But dang, if only they’d gotten the green light — 1960s cartoon Spider-Man and 1960s Filmation Superman, and Nicholas Hammond’s web-slinger and Christopher Reeve’s Man of Steel.

Oh, if only!

Slott took to social media to mourn:

Ludicrous stuff I pitched for SPIDER-MAN/SUPERMAN #1:"Can I do the Spider-Man '67 cartoon meets Filmation Superman '66 cartoon? Or Spider-Man '67 meets the Alex Toth designed SuperFriends Superman?"And Marvel was like, "Are you insane? Do you know the approvals we'd have to get for that? No."

DanSlott (@danslott.bsky.social) 2026-01-17T01:14:18.757Z

Ludicrous stuff I pitched for SPIDER-MAN/SUPERMAN #1 Part 2 of 2:"Can I do 70's TV Live Action Nicholas Hammond Spider-Man meets Superman: The Movie Christopher Reeve Superman?"And Marvel was like, "You think that would be EASIER to get through? You KNOW how this works. What is wrong with you?!"

DanSlott (@danslott.bsky.social) 2026-01-17T01:19:26.006Z

Those pesky approvals!

At least there’s always this old Alex Ross take-off on the back cover of the original 1976 Superman vs. the Amazing Spider-Man treasury edition, which was just released as a Facsimile Edition.

Ah, ya just can’t get everything in life. Oh, well.

MORE

— SPIDER-MAN/SUPERMAN #1 Gets Its APRIL Publishing Date — With Tons of Covers. Click here.

— SUPERMAN/SPIDER-MAN #1 — by MARK WAID and JORGE JIMENEZ — Gets Its March Publishing Date. Click here.

Author: Dan Greenfield

Share This Post On

1 Comment

  1. I don’t understand why they didn’t put that Ross image on the back cover of the Alex Ross cover variant.I was totally expecting it to be there. It wasn’t like it was messing with it being a facsimile since the front cover was already by Ross. Total miss in my opinion

    Post a Reply

Leave a Reply to MikeBCancel reply