DETECTIVE COMICS #168: Dear DC, How About a FACSIMILE EDITION of the RED HOOD’s Debut?

Long, long, long overdue…

Every so often, we post lists of 13 Facsimile Editions we’d like to see, whether from DC or Marvel. A lot of the issues have come to fruition, so we’re probably due for another list or two.

But before we even go down that road, I want to make a special plea for an issue that just happens to be celebrating its 75th anniversary this month: 1950’s Detective Comics #168, featuring the revelation that the Joker began his career as a mysterious criminal called the Red Hood.

Lew Sayre Schwartz pencils, George Roussos inks

The story — by Bill Finger, Lew Sayre Schwartz, George Roussos, with a minor assist by Win Mortimer — has been reprinted many times but the issue itself is absolutely crying out for the Facsimile treatment, especially when you consider how many Bat-first issues we’ve gotten to date.

Off the top of my head, the lineup includes the first appearances of Batman, Robin, the Joker, Catwoman, the Penguin, the Riddler, Two-Face, the original Clayface, Poison Ivy, Man-Bat, Talia, Ra’s al Ghul, Jason Todd, his guise as the modern Red Hood, and Damian Wayne, not to mention vehicles — even the Batarang! There have also been Facsimiles just to highlight famous covers.

Detective Comics #168 has you covered on both points — its memorable cover was recreated some years back by Mike Mignola as a DC 75th Anniversary variant. (That art could even be used again as a variant for a Facsimile.)

I have to imagine it’s only a matter of time before this happens. I’m just surprised it hasn’t happened yet: As I noted, the ish just celebrated 75 years on Dec. 20; further, the Joker is a franchise in his own right. (Two Oscars!) There have been plenty of opportunities — hell, the Joker and Red Hood just faced off in the event DC K.O. And Matt Fraction and Jorge Jimenez will be tackling a very different kind of Joker in March. The original Red Hood also has at least four action figures that I know of.

And still… nothing. Perhaps there’s something objectionable in one of the ads or one of the back-ups? Or maybe DC doesn’t have a copy suitable for reproduction? (The issue isn’t on DC Universe Infinite.)

All I can do is speculate.

And all I can do is ask that DC right this one — because it’d for sure be a dead-solid seller, especially with a cover that’d look great in foil, and trade dress that’s crying out for a logo sketch cover.

MORE

— DC COMICS to Publish FIVE Facsimile Editions in March. Click here.

— DC to Republish THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS As Four Monthly FACSIMILE EDITIONS. Click here.

Author: Dan Greenfield

Share This Post On

8 Comments

  1. Even though it’s more recent and owning both covers, I’d be happy with a facsimile of Batman #700. Time and the Batman was a fantastic issue.

    Post a Reply
  2. The cherry picking of Batman issues in the #600s makes me want another facsimile run rather than specific single issues.

    But yeah, I’ll take a #168.

    Post a Reply
  3. It’s not a full facsimile of the issue, but the Red Hood story is one of the villain origins included in the treasury-sized reprint coming in February, the Limited Collectors Edition C-39 aka the first volume of Secret Origins (of) Super-Villains.

    Post a Reply
  4. Yes, the cover alone will sell it. Finger crossed.

    Post a Reply
  5. More Golden Age facsimiles in general and fewer from the last 30 years.

    Post a Reply
    • I agree and more Silver Age facsimiles.

      Post a Reply
  6. The recent reprint of Action Comics #23 heavily edited the Tex Thomson story to remove the blackface character Gargantua T. Potts. The character’s dialogue has either been eliminated (for example, panel 4 of story page 2) or in some cases altered and given to other characters (for example, the first word balloon on story page 1 has been changed from “Say Mr. Tex – w-what am dat knockin’?” to “Say Tex – w-what’s knockin’?”). Panel 6 of story page 7 has been deleted entirely, and panels 4 and 5 of that story page have been realigned to center them within the page.

    So if DC really wanted to reprint Detective Comics #168, they wouldn’t let the presence of anything objectionable in one of the ads or one of the back-ups stop them. They’d edit it and, as they did with Action Comics #23, publish a “fakesimile.”

    Post a Reply
  7. If DC is Listening, how about Brave and the Bold #52, “3 Battle Stars” for Memorial Day.

    Post a Reply

Leave a Reply